This page has two jobs. First, it explains every ingredient printed on the panel of the pouch we sell, what each one is, and what the research does and does not say about it, including who was in each study, at what amount and who paid for it. Second, and this is the part most advertising pages leave out, it lists the headlines we run, tells you which ones are exaggerated, and separates the small number of things that are genuinely supported by evidence from the many that are not.
You almost certainly arrived here from an advertisement. The headline you clicked was written by us and paid for by us to appear next to real news stories. It was designed to make you stop scrolling. Several of our headlines overstate what science actually shows, and a few attribute statements to experts who do not exist.
Everything on this site is a paid advertisement for a product we sell. If you buy through a link on any of our pages, we are paid a commission. That is the reason this site exists.
The product is a 3.17-ounce (90 g) pouch of powder made for and sold by Laird Superfood, Inc. of Sisters, Oregon as a dietary supplement. A serving is half a teaspoon weighing 1.3 grams, and the pouch holds about sixty-nine of them. That 1.3 grams is printed as a single blend line covering organic lion's mane mushroom, L-theanine and coffee berry, with no split printed between the three; the lion's mane is mycelium and fruiting bodies grown on gluten-free organic oats, so part of that weight is the grain, and the bag does not say what part. It contains caffeine from the coffee berry, in an amount the panel does not state. It is not a medicine, it is not meant for any medical condition, and no study has ever tested these three ingredients together in anyone. The label carries the standard statement that its claims have not been evaluated by the FDA. No food, drink or supplement on this page is a substitute for your own clinician.
If you are genuinely worried about your memory, the single most useful thing you can do is book an appointment with your own clinician. That costs you nothing from us, and a proper conversation about your nights, your hearing, what you take daily and your habits is worth more than anything we are selling. We would rather you close this page and make that call than buy something under a false impression.
These are the headlines we have run, grouped by the claim they make. The right-hand column is our own plain assessment. We have marked each family of headlines as Exaggerated, Partly true, Withdrawn, Our headline was wrong or Broadly supported.
| The headline as you saw it | What is actually behind it |
|---|---|
| "Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Spell These 3 Words. Test Now""Top Doctors Say Mental Decline Begins When Seniors Can't Pronounce These 3 Phrases. Can You?""Memory Decline Begins When Seniors Say These 3 Phrases (See The List)""Declining Memory Begins When Seniors Say These 7 Phrases. See Which Ones" | Exaggerated There is no set of three words, three phrases or seven phrases whose spelling or pronunciation marks the beginning of anything. Nothing "begins" at a word. Word tasks do appear inside the short memory checks clinicians use, but those checks are given in person and read alongside your history, what you take daily and your age. Failing a word online means nothing on its own: plenty of people stumble over a word when they are tired, nervous or being timed. "Top doctors" refers to no specific person. See section 4. |
| "Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Greatest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Avoid Drinking These 3 Beverages""Japan's Oldest Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Exaggerated No group of Japanese doctors issued this statement. There is no such panel, no such list, and no source we can point you to. Japan appears in the headline because it is widely associated with long life, which makes the claim feel credible. That is a marketing decision, not a citation. The second half is also wrong. Memory changes with age for everyone, and no diet removes that. What is true is narrower: certain long-term drinking and eating patterns travel with faster slippage on thinking tests in large population studies. [1] [2] Association is not proof of cause, and "just avoid these three" is not how any of it works. |
| "Nobel Prize's Doctors Say Memory Loss Isn't Age: Just Stop Eating These 3 Foods" | Withdrawn We retract this one outright. No Nobel laureate has endorsed this page, this product, or any list of three foods on our behalf. Attaching the Nobel Prize to an advertisement implies an authority that does not exist and we should not have run it. |
| "The Overlooked Boxed Cereal Now Tied to 8 Out of 10 Memory Cases" | Our headline was wrong There is no such statistic. No study ties any cereal to eight out of ten cases of anything, "memory cases" is not a category any researcher uses, and no cereal has been "overlooked" by anyone: the sugar figure is printed on the side of every box. The number was invented for the headline and we withdraw it. The grain of truth is the same as for the other cereal headlines below: a diet heavy in ultra-processed food, the sweet cereal shelf included, travels in a large Brazilian study with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over eight years. [2] That is a modest association across thousands of people, not eight in ten of anyone. See section 3. |
| "Brain Experts Now Say These 3 Cereals Age the Brain Faster Than Time""Scientists Now Say This 1 Cereal Ages the Brain Faster Than Time" | Exaggerated No food ages the brain "faster than time." That phrase was written for effect and it is not a finding from any study. It is also internally inconsistent: in one version it is three cereals, in another it is one, because the number is something we test for click-through, not something anyone measured. The grain of truth: diets high in ultra-processed food are associated with somewhat faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [2] See section 3. |
| "Doctors Now Say This Popular Evening Drink Is Behind Memory Loss" | Partly true The "evening drink" is alcohol, and of everything our ads point at, this is where the evidence is strongest. In British civil servants followed for thirty years, higher drinking went with shrinkage of the hippocampus, the region most involved in forming memories, and with faster decline in word fluency; light drinkers had no edge over non-drinkers. [1] What is overstated is the word "behind." Alcohol is one contributing factor among many, not the cause of memory slips. Cutting back is a genuinely good idea. It is also worth saying plainly: the pouch we sell contains no alcohol, and it is a powder you stir into a drink rather than a drink itself. |
| "Doctors Name 5 Popular Drinks Now Tied To Memory Decline. Coffee Tops The List""Seniors: These 4 Drinks May Be Aging Your Brain Faster""Neurologists Say Cognitive Decline Isn't Age: Just Stop Drinking These 2 Popular Drinks""Doctors: 3 Popular Drinks Now Tied to Memory Loss in Seniors" | Exaggerated Notice that the count changes: two drinks, three, four, five. It changes because it is an advertising variable we rotate, not a number that came out of a study. No neurologist is named in any version, because none was consulted. "Coffee Tops The List" is the clearest thing we have got wrong, and it is especially awkward on this page: the product we sell is a powder designed to be stirred into a cup of coffee. None of the studies here is about plain coffee. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, about two to three 12-ounce cups of brewed coffee, as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults. [3] See section 2. |
| "Brain Doctors: Quit These 4 Drinks Before It's Too Late" | Exaggerated No brain doctor was consulted for this headline, and there is no "too late." The deadline was invented to make you click. The four drinks are the ones in section 2: alcohol, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, energy drinks and sweetened coffee-shop drinks. Cutting back on them is sensible for your nights, your weight and your wallet, and heavy drinking travels with poorer memory outcomes over years. [1] There is no evidence that quitting them on any particular day changes anything about your memory. See section 2. |
| "Memory Slipping? Check These 4 Everyday Drinks First" | Partly true Half right, in the wrong order. If your memory is slipping, the first thing to check is not a drink; it is a conversation with your own clinician about your nights, your hearing and what you take daily. The four drinks are the everyday ones in section 2. Not enough plain water belongs on the list too. See section 2. |
| "Still Sharp at 90? Seniors Are Rethinking These 3 Everyday Foods" | Partly true The gentlest of our headlines, and still an overstatement. Nobody knows what keeps a particular person sharp at 90, and no single food does it. The three everyday foods are sugary breakfast cereals, processed meats and packaged baked goods, all in section 3. Eating less of them is part of the long, slow habits in section 5, and no food is a promise at any age. |
| "A spoonful of mushroom in the morning coffee, from an Oregon company" | Partly true The spoonful is real and so is the company: half a level teaspoon, 1.3 grams, stirred into coffee, tea or a smoothie, from Laird Superfood, Inc. of Sisters, Oregon. What the headline leaves out is the size of that spoonful next to the research. The only trial of lion's mane in adults over fifty used 3.2 grams a day of fruiting body for twelve weeks, [4] which is about two and a half times the entire scoop, and the scoop is shared with two other ingredients. See section 6. |
| "Part of This Spoonful Is the Oat the Mushroom Grew On" | Broadly supported This is the one headline we run that states a fact you can check on the pouch itself, and it checks out. The panel describes the lion's mane as mycelium and fruiting bodies grown on gluten-free organic oats. That is the ordinary way mushroom powders are made at scale: the mycelium is grown all the way through a bed of sterilized grain, and the grain is dried and milled into the powder with it, because there is no practical way to separate them. So a share of the mushroom weight in your scoop is oat, and the bag does not say what share. The headline states that and nothing more: it does not say the product is padded, it does not say the mushroom is absent, and it does not say the powder does or does not work. See section 6. |
| "Neurologists Name 5 Popular Prescriptions Now Tied to Memory Decline" | Partly true, and the one not to act on alone No neurologist named a list for us, and we will not print one. What is true is that pharmacists keep lists of everyday products, some sold over the counter, that are often a poor fit after 65, and that a yearly look at everything you take is worth having. But an advertisement is the worst possible reason to change anything a clinician gave you: never stop or change it because of something you read in an ad, including ours. Put everything you take in one bag, this pouch included, and ask your pharmacist. See the box at the end of section 2. |
An honest answer: these headlines appear beside real news stories, competing for attention with everything else on the page, and dramatic phrasing gets clicked. That is the incentive, and we are subject to it like every other advertiser.
It is also why this page exists. Once you are here, you are entitled to know exactly which claims we can stand behind and which ones were written to get your attention. Everything below is the sober version.
Our headlines have referred, in different versions, to "3 beverages", "4 drinks", "5 popular drinks", "2 popular drinks" and "this popular evening drink" without ever naming them. Here is the complete list of what we were pointing at, and what the research actually supports for each one. Where a study is cited, it is observational unless stated otherwise: it can show that two things travel together in a population, not that one causes the other.
This is the "popular evening drink" · Best-supported of the group
What the research says. A long-running study of British civil servants found that higher drinking, even at moderate levels, went with shrinkage of the hippocampus and faster decline in word fluency, and that light drinkers had no advantage over people who did not drink. [1] Alcohol also disturbs your nights and interacts with many everyday products.
Honest verdict. Of everything on this list, cutting back on alcohol has the strongest case behind it. It is still not "the cause" of memory slips, and no amount of cutting back is a promise.
About the product we sell. It contains no alcohol. It is a powder of three ingredients, half a level teaspoon a day, stirred into a drink you already have.
Important. If you drink heavily every day, do not stop abruptly on your own. Ask your clinician how to cut back safely.
Named in our headline as the worst offender · Our headline was wrong
What the research says. None of the studies on this page is about ordinary black coffee. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day, about two to three 12-ounce cups of brewed coffee, as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults, and puts one 12-ounce cup at 113 to 247 milligrams. [3] The European food safety authority reached a similar place: single doses up to 200 milligrams and daily intakes up to 400 do not raise safety concerns for healthy adults, and caffeine in moderate doses increases alertness. [5]
Honest verdict. "Coffee Tops The List" was a bad headline, and it sits badly beside a product designed to be stirred into coffee. If you drink coffee and it does not cost you your nights, the evidence does not ask you to give it up.
About the product we sell. It contains caffeine from the coffee berry and the panel does not print how many milligrams. Count it with your coffee, keep it to the morning, and if you are sensitive to caffeine this is the line on the panel to think about. One customer on the seller's own page gives it four stars and says it gives her the jitters, which she attributes to the coffee berry.
Part of the "3 popular drinks" and "4 drinks" · Partly supported
What the research says. Soft drinks sit on the ultra-processed shelf, and in a Brazilian study of 10,775 adults followed for about eight years, the people who ate and drank the most from that shelf slipped somewhat faster on thinking tests than those who ate the least. [2]
Honest verdict. A reasonable thing to cut down on, mostly for reasons that have nothing to do with a dramatic headline. Replacing them with water is a cheap, low-risk change.
Part of the "4 drinks brain doctors want seniors to quit" · Indirect concern
What the research says. There is little direct research linking energy drinks to memory. The concern is more immediate: high caffeine loads combined with sugar can bring a faster heartbeat, palpitations, jitters, an upset stomach and a poor night. [3]
Honest verdict. Worth avoiding if you are over 65 or sensitive to caffeine, for those reasons rather than any proven memory effect. Note that this applies to our own product too, which carries caffeine it does not quantify.
The version of "coffee" our ads should have named · Partly supported
What the research says. These are sugary drinks that happen to contain coffee. Whatever applies to sugar-sweetened beverages applies to them. A large flavored frappé can carry as much added sugar as a soft drink.
Honest verdict. If our "coffee" headline had meant this, it would have been defensible. It did not, and we should have been specific.
Part of the "3 beverages" · Partly supported
What the research says. Same story: the sugar is the issue, not the tea or the fruit. Whole fruit behaves quite differently from fruit juice, which delivers the sugar without the fiber.
Honest verdict. Read these as soft drinks, because nutritionally that is largely what they are. Plain green tea, incidentally, is where the L-theanine in our pouch comes from, and a brewed cup already carries roughly 25 to 60 milligrams of it.
We do not print a list, and you should not act on one from an advertisement. Do not stop, reduce or skip anything a clinician gave you because of this page or any of our headlines.
The right action is simple: put everything you take, including what you buy over the counter, into one bag with this pouch and take it to your pharmacist. Ask: "Is anything here a poor choice at my age, and does anything here argue with a powder that carries caffeine?" That last question is the one that matters most here, because the amount of caffeine in this product is not printed and it goes into a cup that already has some. The bag itself says to ask a licensed healthcare provider first if you are pregnant or nursing, have a health condition, or take anything daily.
The food headlines referred to "3 foods" and to "cereals": one cereal in some versions, three in others. Again, the number was ours, not a finding. Here is what was meant, and what stands behind it.
The "3 cereals" / "1 cereal" that "age the brain faster than time" · Partly supported
What the research says. Frosted, honey-coated and chocolate cereals are mostly refined starch and added sugar, and many carry more sugar per serving than a cookie. They sit on the ultra-processed shelf that travels with faster slippage on thinking tests over years. [2] No study has found that any cereal "ages the brain faster than time." That phrase is ours and it is not defensible. In the Framingham families, diets that carried more choline, which is eggs, milk, meat and beans, went with better scores on memory tests. [6]
Honest verdict. Reading the sugar figure on the box is a sensible habit. Plain oats, plain shredded wheat and unsweetened whole-grain cereals are inexpensive swaps. Our own product contains no choline of any kind, and, as it happens, the oats in it are there as the bed the mushroom was grown on rather than as breakfast.
The honest version of all our food headlines · Partly supported
What the research says. A large Brazilian cohort found that adults with the highest intake of ultra-processed foods slipped faster on overall thinking and planning tests over roughly eight years than those who ate the least. [2] This is observational, the effect size was modest, and diet is tangled up with income, education and dozens of other factors.
Honest verdict. The pattern of your food over years matters more than any single item. That is a duller message than "these 3 foods", which is exactly why our headlines do not say it.
Usually one of the "3 foods" · Partly supported
What the research says. Processed meats are part of the ultra-processed shelf in the study above. [2]
Honest verdict. Worth moderating. Not an emergency, and not undone by any supplement or any powder.
The refined-carbohydrate group · Partly supported
What the research says. The eating pattern most studied for memory is the MIND pattern: leafy greens, berries, beans, nuts, whole grains, olive oil and fish. In a three-year trial of 604 older adults, the group that ate that way and a group that simply ate a little less both improved their thinking scores, by about the same amount. [7]
Honest verdict. The useful advice was never "stop eating these 3 foods." It is "shift the overall pattern," which takes months and cannot be sold in a headline.
Drink less alcohol. Drink less sugar. Keep your coffee, earlier in the day if it costs you your nights. Eat more like the MIND or Mediterranean pattern (vegetables, whole grains, beans, nuts, olive oil, fish, berries) and less like a vending machine. Every one of those changes costs nothing extra, and none of them requires anything we sell.
Several of our headlines invite you to test yourself on words or phrases: spell these three words, pronounce these three phrases, see whether you say these seven phrases. There is no such validated test, and we cannot give you a real one, because a real one does not work that way.
What an actual memory check looks like. Clinicians use short structured checks. They do include word tasks: recalling three unrelated words after a delay, naming animals, repeating a sentence. But three things make them different from an online quiz:
These checks also produce false alarms. A bad night, trouble hearing, and simply being nervous all lower scores in people whose memory is fine. This is precisely why an online word quiz is meaningless: it has none of the context that makes the real check useful.
We are sorry. Take it as a prompt rather than a verdict: if the worry is real, bring it to your own clinician and ask for a proper memory check. If it was just a startling headline, the reassurance you are looking for cannot come from a quiz on an advertising page, including this one.
If we only had one section to be useful in, this would be it. None of these is a supplement, a powder, or a list of three foods, and none of them can be sold to you by us.
These are unglamorous. They cannot be delivered in a headline, they take years, and they are, by a wide margin, the most useful things on this entire page.
What each ingredient printed on the panel of Laird Superfood Focus and Memory Mushrooms is, what it is traditionally used for, and what the cited research says, including who was in each study, at what amount and who paid for it. A serving is half a level teaspoon weighing 1.3 grams, and the pouch holds about sixty-nine of them. Three notes on the panel itself. The 1.3 grams is a single blend line covering all three ingredients and no split between them is printed anywhere, so the amount of any one of them is unknown outside the company. The lion's mane is mycelium and fruiting bodies grown on gluten-free organic oats, which means a share of that weight is the grain the mycelium grew through, and that share is not stated. And the coffee berry brings caffeine in an amount the panel does not print, which matters because the powder is designed to go into coffee. The pouch also carries a California Proposition 65 notice about lead, a notice required in that state when a product can expose a person to more than a set daily amount of a listed substance; it appears on a great many plant-derived foods and powders because plants take up trace metals from soil, and it is a labelling requirement rather than a finding about this batch. If that notice concerns you, ask the seller for its testing figures before you buy.
An edible mushroom with long, white, downward-hanging spines that grows on older beech and oak trees in temperate forests across the Northern Hemisphere. It is eaten as food, especially in East Asia and the United States, with a texture often compared to crab or lobster.
Traditional and everyday use. Known as yamabushitake in Japan and houtougu in China, it has a long history of use as a food and in East Asian and Native American traditions.
What the research says. In a 12-week placebo-controlled trial of 31 healthy adults over 50, a daily lion's mane fruiting-body preparation (3.2 g/day) was associated with higher scores on a standard mental-status test compared with placebo.[4] A visual-retention test in the same trial did not change, and the dose was far larger than most blends and extracts deliver. In a separate pilot trial in 41 healthy adults aged 18 to 45, a single 1.8 g dose was associated with faster performance on the Stroop task an hour later, while 28 days of it produced only a non-significant trend on self-rated stress.[11]
Amount per serving in Focus and Memory Mushrooms. part of a 1.3 g blend (the 12-week trial in adults over 50 used 3.2 g a day of fruiting body)
Good to know. Generally regarded as safe as a food. Stomach discomfort, nausea and skin rash were reported by a few participants in one clinical study. Avoid if you are allergic to mushrooms.
An amino acid found almost exclusively in tea leaves (Camellia sinensis) and in a few mushrooms. A cup of brewed green tea contains roughly 25 to 60 mg of it. It is what gives green tea its savoury, brothy taste.
Traditional and everyday use. Consumed for centuries as part of everyday tea drinking in China and Japan; isolated and named in Japan in 1949.
What the research says. In a placebo-controlled study in men and women aged 50 to 69, a single dose of l-theanine was associated with a faster reaction time on an attention task and with more correct answers and fewer omission errors on a working-memory task.[12] The published summary of that study does not state the dose used, so no comparison with any product amount can be made from it. In a four-week crossover trial of 30 healthy adults averaging 48 years, 200 mg a day was followed by better verbal-fluency and executive-function scores; against placebo the verbal-fluency gain showed in the half who started lower, and two authors worked for the supplier.[13]
Amount per serving in Focus and Memory Mushrooms. part of a 1.3 g blend (amount not printed)
Good to know. Generally well tolerated. If you are pregnant, nursing, or take anything daily, talk to your doctor before adding any supplement.
The red fruit that surrounds the coffee bean, usually discarded after the beans are removed; dried and powdered it contains polyphenols and a small, variable amount of caffeine.
Traditional and everyday use. The fruit is drunk as 'cascara' tea in Yemen and Bolivia.
What the research says. In a single-dose study in healthy adults (10 per group), 100 mg of whole coffee fruit concentrate raised a blood marker (BDNF) by about 143 % over two hours; the authors asked for larger studies, and a blood marker is not a memory test.[14] Whatever alertness the powder gives comes from its caffeine, which EFSA says increases alertness in moderate doses.[5]
Amount per serving in Focus and Memory Mushrooms. part of a 1.3 g blend (a natural source of caffeine; milligrams not printed)
Good to know. Contains caffeine in an amount the label does not state; one verified reviewer reports jitters. Count it with your coffee.
*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. This information does not constitute medical advice and it should not be relied upon as such. This product is not a substitute for medication or other treatment prescribed by a physician or health care provider. Consult your doctor before starting any dietary supplement.
Set against the headlines that brought you here, this is the complete and honest position.
Things we cannot promise, and that nobody selling you a supplement can:
Things we can say honestly:
No. Those attributions are advertising language. No named or identifiable expert made those statements, and none has endorsed this product.
None of the studies on this page is about plain coffee, and our "Coffee Tops The List" headline overstated it, awkwardly so for a product you stir into coffee. What is worth watching is added sugar in coffee drinks and caffeine late enough in the day to cost you a night. The Food and Drug Administration cites 400 milligrams of caffeine a day as an amount not generally associated with negative effects in most healthy adults. [3]
No. Not on your own, and not because of an advertisement. Take everything you take to your pharmacist and ask whether anything is a poor fit for your age.
Nobody outside the company can say. The panel prints 1.3 grams for the whole blend and no split between the three ingredients, and part of the lion's mane weight is the oat the mycelium was grown through.
It means the mushroom was grown indoors through a bed of sterilized oats. The grain is dried and milled into the powder along with the mycelium, because there is no practical way to separate them, so some of what you stir into the cup is oat.
No. The mushroom is the fruiting body, the part you would recognize on a log; the mycelium is the fine root-like web that grows through the wood or grain first. This panel lists both, without saying how much of each.
The bag says it contains caffeine from the coffee berry and prints no milligrams. Count it with your coffee, and remember that one 12-ounce cup of brewed coffee already carries 113 to 247 milligrams. [3]
About sixty-nine mornings at one half-teaspoon scoop a day. The return window is thirty days from the day it reaches your house, so you decide with most of the powder still in your kitchen.
The seller gives you 30 days from the time you receive it. Write to aloha@lairdsuperfood.com or call (888) 670-6796 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Pacific time.
It is a California labelling requirement that appears on many plant-derived powders, because plants take up trace metals from soil. It is a notice, not a test result for your bag; ask the seller for its figures if it concerns you.
A fair question. Do not take our word for it. The references below are real, published sources you can look up yourself, and nothing in sections 4 and 5 requires you to buy anything or trust us. If this page and our headlines disagree, believe this page.
Yes, and you should. Every numbered reference below can be found by searching its authors and journal. For general information, the National Institute on Aging (nia.nih.gov) publishes plain-language material and sells nothing.
These are the sources behind the claims marked with a number above. Several are observational studies, which can show association but not cause. The lion's mane trials used amounts this pouch does not reach, in rooms of 31 and 41 people; the L-theanine study closest to this reader's age does not publish its dose; the coffee-fruit study measured a blood marker in ten people per group; the fact sheets are the governments' own. None of them tested this pouch. We have deliberately not cited anything for the claims we describe as exaggerated, because there is nothing to cite.
Citing a study does not mean the study is about this product. The studies above tested one ingredient at a time, in other people, at amounts this pouch does not match, not the pouch itself; none of the research tested Laird Superfood Focus and Memory Mushrooms, and none of it supports it.
This site is an advertising publication. Wintergreen Daily is not a news organization, is not affiliated with any news outlet whose page our advertisements appear on, and is not affiliated with the National Institutes of Health, the Nobel Foundation, the Food and Drug Administration, or any medical body, university or government agency named on this page. Logos and names of publishers appear in our reporting dashboards only to describe where advertisements were placed; they imply no endorsement whatsoever.
The product on this site is made for and sold by Laird Superfood, Inc. of Sisters, Oregon. Headlines used in our advertising are promotional and may be dramatized, generalized or exaggerated for attention. Where a headline conflicts with this page, this page is correct. Individual results, testimonials and endorsements do not represent typical results. We are compensated when readers purchase products through our links.
Medical disclaimer. Nothing on this page is medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Do not delay seeking professional advice, and do not stop or change anything a clinician gave you, because of anything you read here. If you are worried about memory or concentration, your own or a family member's, speak to a qualified healthcare professional. In an emergency, call your local emergency number.